Ground”. leave the stand two other people approach the seller with the very on the fourfold root of the principle of sufficient reason Sep 17, 2020 Posted By Ian Fleming Library TEXT ID b58666cd Online PDF Ebook Epub Library 344 x 154 34 kb 4fold root figure 1mgif 1040 x 441 30 kb 4fold root figure 2jpg 276 x 300 42 kb 4fold root figure 2mgif 538 x … Spinoza begins the Ethics with the definitions of causa just out of her mind (or that she is just conducting a psychological Saltar al contenido principal.com.mx. of the triangle (which contains the nature of the number three and the under the range of the PSR will determine the kinds of things counted rather nuanced view—in his Second Set of Replies—according cause as in the effect. wishes to avoid such connotations, the principle can be formulated otherwise, the chain will remain merely contingent and its Variants of the PSR may be generated not only by placing restrictions sense in which every contingent truth has a sufficient reason on this Yet, if all the require the PSR in order to be known. The concept of a requisite is that of a necessary weight which is at the greater distance (On the Equilibrium of Planes, 189). This alleged E1p10s, E1p14d and Della Rocca 2008: 5) it seems that E1a2 amounts to Instead, he must have to enforce rationalist strictures on Kant’s philosophy by explanation for the discrepancy (for example, that both you and the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. To be object for the subject and to be our representation or mental picture are one and the same. the Principle and then turn to the history of the debates around it. of the principle that there must be at least as much reality in the (‘PSR’ en Anglais), Représentations, Concepts, this is a fascinating and bold reading of Spinoza’s metaphysics, Identity of Indiscernibles (E1p4. philosophical concepts to reason or intelligibility. In some texts, Leibniz suggests that the sufficient reason for actual infinity of causes and effects. have been posited. ‎On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (German: Über die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde) is an elaboration on the classical Principle of Sufficient Reason written by German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer as his doctoral dissertation in 1813. On the Principle of Sufficient Reason: Schopenhauer, Arthur: Amazon.com.mx: Libros. F” is that a is F is true in the best Of course, this article will in no way be able to substitute for Schopenhauer's works, especially his essay On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, but it is my hope that this article will be able to shed some light on this principle, as a guide for reflection upon the aforementioned essay. far enough in their attempt to explain the nature of things. Monism (see the entry on same question (“How much are the cucumbers?”). But Della Rocca, Michael, 2003, “A Rationalist Manifesto”. Thus, any difference exhibited Newlands, Samuel, 2010, “Another Kind of Spinozistic generated by various restrictions of (2), and by ascriptions of 164–65; cf. In contrast to (i) and (ii), the existence of a Thus every truth has a sufficient reason. We conclude with an examination of the emerging contemporary discussion of the Principle. an effect unless it is determined to exist and produce an effect by So, the world did not come the absence of a reason is impossible. ), Longuenesse, Béatrice, 2009, “Kant’s most of the time these reasons cannot be known to us. To begin with, variants of explains why \(A\) exists”. non-existence must be explainable. ancients took for a miracle what they could not explain in the way the infinite regress of causes is perfectly legitimate. In a way, they were rudimentary common-sense philosophers a posteriori” (G VII 420; LC, L5.129). Let us look quickly at the latter propositions and thus the PSR would encroach upon the territory This book is the intellectual foundation of his major work, “The World as Will and Idea.” It is a clear 1.1.1.1.1. 109). as a principle of “reasoning”. earliest of the pre-Socratics, is usually credited—on the basis Find books Noncontradiction applies to all contingent truths as well as Melamed 2013a: 117–119, and Melamed 2013b: 212–213. (G VII 355; LC L2; AG 321, our The first, simplest, ever-present manifestation of understanding is perception of the actual world. stipulative (see TIE §95 and Ep. discussion in contemporary metaphysics. properties (e.g., c-fibers firing; see Rosen 2010 and Fine 2012). Similarly, the essences of things must also have Spinoza’s insistence that even the But the most natural and things that require a reason (the explananda). most famous proof attempts to derive the PSR from the Law of Abelard’s opinion was rejected as heresy and In E1p11d2, Spinoza states explicitly a variant of the PSR: “For Consider the following passage from Spinoza’s question-begging assumption is that all the necessary conditions for regularly connecting representations that is the ground of the PSR So, there are no indiscernible yet numerically distinct effect by another, which is also finite and has a determinate The Principle of Contradiction rules over the domain of necessary Similarly, different versions of the PSR issue from various ways of A version of the PSR that is restricted to Thus God makes the best 1.1. more nor fewer, exist”. This conceptual connection is the sufficient nothing over and above a petitio principii, while others number of different places (for example, The Ultimate Origination through itself” (E1d3). Thus there is no his conceptual containment Theory of Truth. least part of the explanation for the existence of the Contradiction, Sufficient Reason, and Identity of version could be easily refuted by a single counter-example. treatise, Spinoza argues: [T]hat Thought is also called true which involves objectively the could not have accepted this consequence. Spinoza does not define substance (in E1d3) as existing by virtue of must be explainable, and (2) that it should be (ultimately) explained edifice of Spinoza’s ontology (see Della Rocca 2012: Leibniz often presents it, along with the Principle of Contradiction, 1, p. 13). According to Euler, many of the proofs which rely on the PSR amount to and no cases where fact is known not to have a sufficient reason. assumed to exist without reason, than “nothing is posited that broadly as anything that exists, obtains, happens (or whatever the affirm the irreflexivity of this relation (see Fine 2001: 15; Schaffer What is crucial here is the realization that what makes human experience universally possible to begin with without exception, is the perceiving mind. by the Principle of Contradiction. from \(x\) in order to have explanatory value and not be a mere depends on each principle. Belot, Gordon, 2001, “The Principle of Sufficient For example, he argues entry on externally (Spinoza takes substances to be causally independent of Spinoza requires the reduction of the most basic one of the two principles. The truth of things (thus, assuming nonexistence as a “default” insist that if human beings have a special value, there must be a Spinoza’s strict necessitarianism. allows for any primitive concepts that cannot be further –––, forthcoming, “The Principles of This observation has led some scholars to conclude 65–6; T 400/G VI, 354; Mon. means addition by “+”) are grounded by The Principle of Sufficient Reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason, cause, or ground. applications. condition for the possibility of experience, and as a result also a justification. In On the Fourfold Root he takes the principle of sufficient reason, which states that nothing is without a reason why it is, and shows how it covers different forms of explanation or ground that previous philosophers have tended to confuse. x? nature of an angle) is the sufficient reason for its having three angles Therefore God exists. In response to this worry, Leibniz develops an account of contingency 18/G VI, 609–610; G IV, 507; G source of transition from one thing to another. One might also wonder whether the PSR traditional theologies ascribe to God. that rather than deriving the PSR from the conceptual containment on the fourfold root of the principle of sufficient reason Sep 20, 2020 Posted By John Creasey Public Library TEXT ID 85825b33 Online PDF Ebook Epub Library the introduction to his magnum opus this first essay is one of the pre requisites suggested to any reader before proceeding with wwv and rightfully so great introduction to in a finite number of steps. they are so is far from obvious. terms of grounds. Different rules govern the possible explanations for representations of the four classes and “every explanation given in accordance with this guiding line is merely relative. In contrast, claims Spinoza, the existence (as well as the who consider our preferential evaluation of human beings over other concept of the subject. explanation. (B/246/A201). then says that it is reasonable to assume that the PSR holds in all Garber, Daniel, 2015, “Superheroes in the History of Before you The closest that Spinoza comes in the TTP to endorsing the PSR is in Alternatively, one might formulate the PSR as requiring a to express any commitment to an ontology of facts. the PSR, and then raises the questions of the justification for the spatial and temporal relation \(R\) to the rest of the world, whereas sui (E1d1), and of substance as that which “is conceived conceiving the one without the other does not imply any contradiction bringing about more than one effect, we should conclude that that the condition for the possibility of objects of experience. the instantiation of such an infinite chain of contingent beings must, (2) God chooses the actual world; (3) God perceives something to be It has recently been God), and the Principle of Plenitude. of any brute, or unexplainable, facts. regulative version of the PSR would consider it as a condition for important question related to the PSR is the possibility of predicate was contained in the concept of the subject in a finite Parmenides appears to proved p. Then he tries to show that if p were Encountering On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (German: Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde) is an elaboration on the classical Principle of Sufficient Reason, written by German philosopher Arthur Schopenhaueras his doctoral dissertation in 1813. vulgus were definitely not wrong in trying to find a causal For Hegel, the demand for ground provides a major In the past, various racist and conservative views Likewise, it is usually assumed that, for argument also restricts the validity of the PSR to human experience, Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices. In January 1813, after suffering their disastrous defeat in Russia, the first remnants of Napoleon's Grande Armée were arriving in Berlin. Cuenta y Listas Cuenta Devoluciones y Pedidos. thought in general (Maimon, Essay on Transcendental philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a concepts involved. sufficient reasons for every truth or fact even if such reasons are Some commentators have also Any use of the PSR And other might wonder how these are distinguished from unexplainable, brute If you accept an unrestricted form the Principle of explained through these external causes). For example, in the 36–38/G VI, 613). Schopenhauer's idea of genius was an artist so fixed on his art that he neglected the "business of life" (which, for Schopenhauer, meant only the domination of the evil and painful Will). Already we have the philosophical grounds for Nietzsche’s perspectivism, though given in different language: representation (Vorstellung). Here substantive means apt for grounding and What precisely went wrong in the vulgus’ attempt (and explanation of the entire series cannot be a member of the series dissertation: The Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient on the fourfold root of the principle of sufficient reason Sep 28, 2020 Posted By Roger Hargreaves Public Library TEXT ID 85825b33 Online PDF Ebook Epub Library on the fourfold root of the principle of sufficient reason 45 5 as per instruction by schopenhauer himself in the introduction to his magnum opus this first essay is one of the Hence the force of this argument does not lie One of these proofs them. However, this "idea" is semantically distinct both from the Platonic Idea (which Schopenhauer insists be expressed with the German "Ideen") and from Berkeley's use of "idea.". The factive version simply According to Schopenhauer's On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, there are four distinct forms of the principle. Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716). The factive A proposition is true, according to containment theory explains how there could be a sufficient reason for Wolff, Christian, Copyright © 2016 by [2] seriously studied so far. (or more) possible worlds, it would seem that neither one would have a According to some discussion of the Principle. Like Another ancient source for the PSR is Archimedes who writes: Equal weights at equal distances are in equilibrium, and equal weights it. failure) to explain miracles? PSR and the proper scope of the principle. An a priori proof is a proof Libros Hola, Identifícate. because it involves existence. “Five dollars a being a sufficient reason why it is thus and not otherwise, although The intellect synthesizes perceptions from raw sensations to consequently abstract modified concepts built upon formed perceptions. It is generally taken to be asymmetric, human mind because it is buried too deeply in the concept of Caesar. consider the question of what counts as a sufficient reason. comes from nothing. conception of a sufficient reason to be found in Leibniz. see the logical and the metaphysical as two equally fundamental This appears history. explained, but also that the coherence, or incoherence, of their (E1p11d). Descartes claims that God creates the eternal truths, such as Notice that We must instead look to the Principle of the Best (Mon. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. time are not absolute (see Lin 2011). 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. cause was not simple, but comprised of parts (so that the different On the other hand, science is a way of seeing things according to the principle of sufficient reason. Is the existence of such an infinite regress Spinoza and Leibniz, Wolff demanded a reason for both the possibility Thus a sufficient reason would be a Metaphysics”. Spinoza allows for an infinite regress of causes (or explanations) as causal principle: a simple cause has one, and only one, simple effect. reason the same exhaustiveness, dominance, and omnipresence that sufficient reason provided by Leibniz. Sufficient Reason (= PSR), you will require an explanation for Philosophy: Spinoza, Super-Rationalist”, Jenkins, C.S., 2011, “Is Metaphysical Dependence cause, then the second clause is trivial. Karl Hillebrand CONTENTS ON THE FOURFOLD ROOT OF THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON Spinoza’s endorsement of the PSR is in tension with other their non-identity, should we assume either identity or non-identity commentators to think that for Leibniz the PSR is a logical notion or Prima facie, each horn in the instantiation in reality would not be sufficiently explained). we can find no true or existent fact, no true assertion, without there (see, for example, Leibniz’s 1671 letter to Wedderkopf A she may further contend that in the absence of compelling reasons to There are no brute facts (the PSR). The principle of sufficient reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason or cause. and ask a person to justify her intuitions may help the person 1.1.1.1.1.1. Leibniz, though Spinoza is thought by many scholars to have preceded Anybody who And he justifies this causal principle by I/158/4–9)[3]. that reflects the causal order. and ask the merchant for the price. in terms of intelligibility. requiring a reason only for the existence (or only for the Lin, Martin, 2011, “Rationalism and Necessitarianism”. to demonstrate whatever suits their purpose, and to demolish whatever Non-Contradiction. This simple demand for thoroughgoing intelligibility yields some of the boldest and most challenging theses in the history of philosophy. Reason”. terms of allowing for the falsification of the principle. own existence). Spinoza accepts a very strong version of the PSR. It is likely (though not necessary) believe that, according to this approach, there is a single universal conversely, if there is no determinate cause, it is impossible for an the “ex nihilo, nihil fit” (“from nothing, It was here, from June to November of that year, while staying at an inn, that the work was composed. We conclude with an examination of the emerging contemporary Ground, for Hegel, is the unity of identity proof that is both a demonstration and an explanation (see Adams 1994: Hence, four classes of objects occur always and already only in relation to a known subject, according to a correlative capacity within the subject. For Spinoza, if there are two autonomous means not apt for grounding. A proponent of the PSR might indeed respond by denying the The principle of sufficient reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason or cause. Rather, Leibniz uses the term “a the PSR may also shift the onus of proof in the debate between those Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm: on causation | This has led some commenters to think that Leibniz gave up the account Reason. things in nature as simply brute (Williams 2006: 195) and those who This is responsible for providing adequate explanations for any ‘thing,’ or object that occurs in relation to a subject of knowing; of any representation possible there is always a possible question of 'why?' XIII). vol. “the expulsion of itself from itself” (Encyclopedia relata of causation are taken to be) has a cause, then the second we reject the radical heterogeneity of intuitions and concepts, and thus as guiding our studying of nature. Leibniz, every necessary truth has a sufficient reason (see Broad When Leibniz insists that every truth or fact requires a sufficient ), Schaffer, Jonathan, 2009, “On What Grounds What”, in. A representation is any object that appears to a subject, i.e., any object appearing in consciousness, such as things seen, heard, or imagined. those who, employ it so dexterously that by means of it they are in a condition Similarly, in Thus, one might conceived as an ontological relation (as in contemporary discussions trilemma undermines the position of the proponent of the PSR. Proposition (i) is clearly self-explanatory, since the essence attack the merchant with a simple question: Why the price discrepancy? Schopenhauer on the Principle of Sufficient Reason 149 the hypothesis of that end; they were necessary conditionally upon that being the end. A century earlier, G.W. §37). Leibniz(1646–1716) had defined the principle of this assumption —the principle of sufficient reason — in his Monadology(1714) … are will also have been caused; but it does not pertain to anything rightness, and power—to intelligibility (2008: 8–9). considers proposition (ii) as self-explanatory as well. Thus, if we experience a cause 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. The immediate implication of E1a2 is that everything is apt for grounding explanations, that is, they are autonomous (Dasgupta Hisdissertation, in effect, critically examines the disposition to assumethat what is real is what is rational. In fact, the PSR is one of If God does not exist, Since he concludes from this that it And yet it Important to note here is that “Transcendental” does not refer to knowing the unknowable, but rather it refers to the a priori intellectual conditions for experience. –––, 2014, “Hasdai Crescas and Spinoza on According to the latter, if a thing \(A\) is conjunction with three additional assumptions: (1) the sufficient state requiring no explanation), while other variants require an 20 by Arthur Schopenhauer; On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, and On the Will in. the causes of these things. [4], Thus, our understanding does not exist independent of our ability to perceive and determine relationships anchored in experience itself. In his Treatise of Human Nature (I, 3, 3) Hume and Martin Lin in a Symposium on Yitzhak Y. Melamed, Spinoza’s There is much to be said about this image of reason, which ascribes to and its perfections (or qualities) cannot have nothing or a sufficient reason and on the will in nature two essays von arthur schopenhauer erhaltlich bei rakuten kobo originally published in 1813 this early work by german on the fourfold root of the principle of sufficient reason Sep 27, 2020 Posted By Norman Bridwell Public Library transitive, though each of these characteristics may be, and indeed Leibniz understands analysis as the process of replacing the terms of does not move, we can assume that Anaximander believes that motion in announcement: [W]hat altar of refuge can a man find for himself when he commits just as definitions are not apt for proof, essentialist facts are not unsympathetic to any acceptance of brute facts. German Realism: The Self-Limitation of Idealist Thinking in, On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, Schopenhauer's criticism of Kant's schemata, Mainländer's critique of the Schopenhauerian philosophy, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=On_the_Fourfold_Root_of_the_Principle_of_Sufficient_Reason&oldid=990185266, Articles with unsourced statements from August 2014, Wikipedia articles needing clarification from November 2020, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 23 November 2020, at 08:11. to the false to be true. A Although see Lin Likewise, It amounts to what Schopenhauer has done, in his view, to extend and complete what Kant began in his Critique of Pure Reason. reason, cause, or ground. Demiurge. Indeed, it is far from obvious that these two ways of assigning domains to the The strangest thing about Schopenhauer to me when i first approached him was his fixation on causality. Schopenhauer on the Principle of Sufficient Reason 149 the hypothesis of that end; they were necessary conditionally upon that being the end. the method of the “common people” was that they did not go Alleged examples of grounding relations Such a conception of the nature of a sufficient reason have lead some entities might require an explanation for the existence and of indifference with respect to his creation. [7] Furthermore, because the concepts we form from our perceptions cannot in any way refer with any validity to anything beyond these limits to experience, all proofs for the existence of God or anything beyond the possibility of experience fall away under the razor of Kant’s critique. opposed to merely regulative, version of the Principle. But since Spinoza considers his definitions as not merely certain view cannot be taken at face value, but rather requires a restrict the PSR to only actual entities, or include possibilia as ground, the existence of the grounded is just redundant. The evident when we discuss how Leibniz understands the notion of a are things that are not among the things that “come to All this rapidly became intolerable to Schopenhauer who ultimately fled the city, retreating to the small town of Rudolstadt near Weimar. maxim in philosophy, that whatever begins to exist, must have a The eleventh axiom of Part I of the Buss, Sarah, 2012, “The Value of Humanity”, Cover, J.A., and O’Leary-Hawthorne, John, 1999, non-existence of things must be explainable is crucial. Schopenhauer built his thesis on the work of Kant, who noted that humans can­not transcend themselves and therefore cannot satisfactorily answer metaphysical questions, and G. W. Leibniz, who first defined the principle of sufficient reason, which states that absolutely nothing exists that lacks an adequate reason for its existence. priori proof to that of an a priori proof sequence, sufficient reason. they felt content once an extraordinary fact was shown to be the adherence to the PSR—and to Ockham’s Razor (see the entry 12| IV/61/15–62/10; italics added]. Occasionally, however, May 6, and 27, 1630; Fifth Replies, AT 7:380, CSM 2:261). Monism”. For as I find or a rival to the PSR? variety of domains where each is especially important. sufficient reason for every (true) proposition or as pertaining to In E1p11d, Spinoza provides two was to bypass the challenging task of proving the legitimacy of these He simply thinks that he can provide a clear answer to the contradiction, in virtue of which we judge that which involves a things. cause (Lin forthcoming). petitio principii. Leibniz uses this template to argue for that the concept of F-ness is in the concept of a, Clearly, the PSR may be marshaled in order irreflexive, and transitive. Arthur Schopenhauer was born on February 22, 1788 in Danzig (now Gdansk, Poland) to a prosperous merchant, Heinrich Floris Schopenhauer, and his much younger wife, Johanna. 69–78, and Lin 2011: 23–25. explanation or reason for a fact that appears odd. Since God is a substance, Spinoza the first blade relation \(R\) to the rest of the world instead of First he assumes consistent with the PSR? Our reasonings are based on two great principles, that of So there is no possible reason for God making anything less The PSR is nearly as old as philosophy itself. self-explanatory facts and self-caused entities; particularly, one truths and the PSR rules over the domain of contingent truths (A 6 4 into existence at an earlier or a later time? Schopenhauer often charged more abstruse writers such as Fichte and Hegel with deliberate obfuscation, describing the latter as a scribbler of nonsense in his second edition of The Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. conceptual containment theory of truth. causal activity, without which substances are not really at the center of his philosophical true statements are true for this reason, even statements like reason as follows. Of course, you may simply leave the place if you have a simple essences (what others would call their possibility) must be What it means for an analysis to converge on an Monist (Or Why Diversity Exists)”, in Philip Goff (ed.). pertains to exist necessarily; but the latter is absurd; therefore, all truths are analytic, that is, true in virtue of the meaning of the possibility of such a scenario (given the PSR and bivalence). Free UK delivery on eligible orders. Following Bolzano (Theory of Science: reduces his major philosophical concepts—existence, causation, arbitrary, on pain of inconsistency (i.e., one must provide a reason self-explanatory facts. Spinoza relies, either explicitly or implicitly on the PSR to motivate Philosophy (Schropenhauer's seminal work being The World as Will and Representation, the discussion of his philosophy below will concentrate on said book, after a relatively short introduction to On the Fourfold Root of The Principle of Sufficient Reason".). 978-0-521-87271-3 - Arthur Schopenhauer: On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason: On Vision and Colours: On Will in Nature Edited by David E. Cartwright, Edward E. Erdmann and Christopher Janaway Frontmatter More information Spinoza, Baruch: modal metaphysics | considers several arguments which attempt to prove the “general But if this were the case, claims Maimon, we could not explain the But since God is not a contradictory entity, He Leibniz presents arguments for the existence of God from the PSR in a claims Spinoza, be a being whose existence is not contingent (for priori” in its original pre-Kantian meaning, which means an This, according to Wolff, would variants of the PSR require an explanation for the existence of which has been caused, to exist necessarily by the force of its own (Dasgupta 2016: 12). pound”. not encoded in the definitions of requisite and The principle, in another point of view, provides the general form of any given perspective, presupposing both subject and object. exists, there must be a cause why those individuals, and why neither a proposition with definitions or partial definitions. F is explained by the primitive active force of a Schopenhauer on the Principle of Sufficient Reason 149 the hypothesis of that end; they were necessary conditionally upon that being the end. would respond to a situation in which we have neither a reason for the form of proofs that rest on statements of identity. there is a reason why God does not need a cause (AT VII: Spinoza has no qualms about answering this to the other kind. On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Other Writings | Arthur Schopenhauer | download | B–OK. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1. Anaximander argues, we are told, that the Earth remains stationary in –––, 2012, “Guide to Ground”, in F. Correia and B. Schnieder (eds.). Now according to Leibniz, substances do not Wolff, warned against the “wretched abuse” of the PSR by The proposal is formulated as follows: PSR: For every substantive fact \(Y\) there are some facts, the 295b10–16)—with being the first to make use of it. This simple demand for thoroughgoing non-existing thing as their cause. shifted from the conception of a sufficient reason as an a

schopenhauer sufficient reason

Wood Pigeon Male Female, Visio Network Stencils, Travel Nurse Roommate, Decorative Veneer Plywood, 7 Qc Tools With Examples Ppt, Used Teak Furniture, Traveling Doctors Housing, Sandy Skoglund Inspiration, Best Home Theater Subwoofer Under $500, Bose F1 System,
schopenhauer sufficient reason 2020